Omega X Swatch MoonSwatch Only (Deel III)

[martijnp]

@Brick

Niemand die dat kan controleren

Daar is AI voor

[MIW]

Bedankt voor deze zienswijze en het positieve bericht. Ik voel mijn kansen weer wat stijgen! Hadding for the moon and back

[lasteraar]

@Brick

Je gelooft toch niet dat daadwerkelijk al die antwoorden worden meegewogen. Niemand die dat kan controleren.

[Brick]

@martijnp

Daar is AI voor

Ook voor @lasteraar:

Hoe gaat jouw ai controleren of ze de toewijzingen doen aan de juiste personen en of die al zijn vragen goed heeft beantwoord?

Ik snap heus wel dat je ai kan inzetten om de vragen te controleren.

Maar zoals ik al zei. Dat gaan ze niet doen.

[MarTime]

Stoppen met refreshen. We kunnen rustig het weekend in tot maandag.

[septentrio]

Heb je alle vragen juist dan?

Ik denk dat de meesten afvallen door:

@886.7 beat time (NIET @887)
28 rolling planets
14 majestic outfits

Ik vraag me af of iemand op het forum deze 3 vragen juist heeft. Zoniet zit je er sowieso niet bij.

[L30N]

Damn alles goed alleen ook 887 ipv 886.7

[MarTime]

Bij mij kwam dit eruit

Ik heb alleen geen idee meer wat ik heb gekozen bij de outfits
28 planets had ik wel. Op basis van:

De verklaring:
Hoewel de originele collectie uit 11 verschillende hemellichamen bestaat (en er dus in eerste instantie 11 rijdende auto’s op tournee gingen in Europa), heeft Swatch de vloot wereldwijd flink uitgebreid om meerdere continenten tegelijkertijd te kunnen bedienen.
Om tegelijkertijd in de Verenigde Staten (van de oost- tot de westkust), Europa, Azië en Australië rond te kunnen rijden, heeft Swatch wereldwijd in totaal 28 Rolling Planets ingezet.

[nielsrr]

@septentrio

Most questionnaires use numbers only for navigation. Swatch’s MISSION TO THE MOON 1969 ESTA may use them as clues.
Even the two-hour-and-fifteen-minutecompletion limit appears meaningful: it closely matches the time from Neil Armstrong’s first step on the Moon to his return to the lunar module. That sets the tone for a questionnaire built around hidden references to Apollo time.

The pattern begins with food.

Question 7: The mission that changed space dining
Question 7 asks:
“What would you eat on a trip to the Moon?”

Its position suggests Apollo 7, the first American space mission on which hot food was available. Heated water was used to rehydrate packaged meals, a significant improvement over the cold and compressed foods of earlier missions.
The destination is the Moon, so Apollo 7 supplies the food connection while Apollo 11 supplies the menu. A historically grounded answer is:

A hot Apollo meal: shrimp cocktail, beef and potatoes, and chocolate pudding, as served to the Apollo 11 crew.

Apollo 7 explains why the question appears at number seven; Apollo 11 provides the Moon-bound meal.

Question 11: Apollo 11, the Speedmaster and the mathematics of speed

Question 11 asks when NASA selected the OMEGA Speedmaster as its official watch. The factual answer is: 1965

But the screen also displays: 11/32

The first interpretation is straightforward:
11 evokes Apollo 11.
32 preserves Apollo 11’s launch minute.
The watch is therefore connected to both the mission that made it the Moonwatch and the minute when that mission began.
The fraction itself produces a more surprising result:
11 ÷ 32 = 0.34375
Expressed as a speed:
0.34375 km/s = 343.75 m/s
That is almost exactly the typical speed of sound in Earth’s atmosphere: approximately 343 m/s.

The typical speed of sound in Earth’s atmosphere is approximately 343 m/s. The difference is only 0.75 m/s, or about 0.22 per cent:
11/32 → 343.75 m/s → approximately Mach 1
This appears on a question about the Speedmaster, a chronograph whose tachymeter scale is designed to convert elapsed time into speed.
There is also a looser Apollo connection. Lunar-return spacecraft entered Earth’s atmosphere at roughly 11 km/s, or more than thirty times the speed of sound—approximately Mach 32 under some assumptions. The alignment is therefore striking:
11: Apollo 11
32: the launch minute
11/32: approximately the speed of sound

Question subject: the Speedmaster
These associations do not replace the answer 1965, but they may explain why the Speedmaster question was deliberately placed at number 11.

Question 12: The visionary and the man who saved Apollo 12

Question 12 asks: “Whom would you take with you on a trip to the Moon?”

Two men fit its position unusually well.
The first is John F. Kennedy, who committed the United States to landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely before the end of the 1960s. Taking him would allow the architect of the goal to witness its fulfilment.
His name also provides a numerical confirmation:
JOHN F KENNEDY = 12 letters

The second possibility is John Aaron, whose connection is directly tied to Apollo 12.
Shortly after liftoff, Apollo 12 was struck twice by lightning. Telemetry became scrambled and major spacecraft systems appeared to fail. Aaron recognised the pattern and recommended the now-famous instruction: “SCE to AUX.”
Alan Bean located the obscure switch, the telemetry returned, and Apollo 12 continued safely to the Moon.

Kennedy represents the vision; Aaron represents the knowledge and calm judgment needed to survive the journey. The question number supports both interpretations: Kennedy’s twelve-letter name and Aaron’s defining role in Apollo 12.

A combined answer could be: John F. Kennedy for the dream, with John Aaron on the headset to make sure we reached the Moon and returned safely home.

Question 13: The place Apollo 13 never reached

Question 13 asks:
“Where would you land on the Moon?”

Its position immediately evokes Apollo 13, the mission that was supposed to land but never did.
The simplest answer would be: Nowhere—Apollo 13 never landed.
But the word “would” points toward the mission’s intended destination: Fra Mauro

Apollo 13 was scheduled to explore the Fra Mauro region. After an oxygen-tank explosion forced NASA to cancel the landing, the site was reassigned to Apollo 14.

The number 13 recurs throughout the story: the explosion occurred on April 13, 1970, creating the crisis remembered through the transmission, “Houston, we’ve had a problem.”
The screen also displays: 13/32
This can be read in two ways:
13 evokes Apollo 13.

13/32 visually forms 13:32, Apollo 11’s UTC launch time.
The question therefore combines Apollo 13’s unrealised landing with Apollo 11’s launch timestamp.
The strongest answer is: Fra Mauro—where Apollo 13 would have landed before the oxygen-tank explosion on April 13 changed the mission.

Question 21: An artist whose name completes the question

Question 21 asks:
“Name an artist Swatch should work with.”
There are countless possible answers, but one artist fits the question’s position exactly: 21 Savage

The answer creates a direct number–name correspondence: Question 21 → 21 Savage

Unlike the Apollo references, this clue is not historical. It is pure puzzle construction: the number beside the question becomes part of the answer.
Swatch has a long tradition of working with artists, so the response also fits the brand’s creative identity. The question number does not prove that 21 Savage is the only intended answer, but it gives the choice a structural advantage over an artist selected at random.

Questions 15 and 32: The hidden timestamp
Question 15 asks for the US dollar–Swiss franc exchange rate on 21 July 1969. The correct answer is: 1 USD = 4.31 CHF

But the counter above it reads: 15/32
Read as a time, it becomes 15:32—the exact time at which Swatch opened the application in Switzerland on the Apollo 11 launch anniversary. That corresponds to 13:32 UTC, Apollo 11’s actual launch time.

Question 32 then asks why the application contains 32 questions. The likely answer is that the denominator was needed to make Question 15 display 15/32.
Because Apollo 11 lifted off at 13:32 UTC, and Swatch opened the application at the corresponding 15:32 CEST. With exactly 32 questions, Question 15 becomes 15/32—a hidden timestamp in plain sight.

The numbers do not always tell the participant what to answer. They do something subtler:

Ik kom aardig in de buurt!

[Brick]

@septentrio

Zoniet zit je er sowieso niet bij.

Oh. Denk je echt dat ze alle vragen gaan checken en dan toewijzen? (bijvoorbeeld niemand in België heeft de esta goed, maar in NY hebben 789 mensen deze wel goed)

Denk het niet. Denk dat ze gewoon de tombola gebruiken, verdelen per land en boutique. C’est ca. Op naar de volgende release.

[NOAD]

Dan zit je er sowieso niet bij!

https://youtube.com/shorts/pncvlxXzRgI?si=iBsIbaCX6anYhR5i

[septentrio]

Jullie mogen geloven wat jullie zelf willen hoor, het staat wel gewoon zo in de regels. Ik hoor het graag als straks iemand geselecteerd is met foutieve antwoorden.

[lasteraar]

@Brick

Hoe gaat jouw ai controleren of ze de toewijzingen doen aan de juiste personen en of die al zijn vragen goed heeft beantwoord

@Brick

Ik snap heus wel dat je ai kan inzetten om de vragen te controleren

Ok dus hoef het niet meer te vertellen dan

Ik heb voor de helft zomaar wat lolligs ingevuld. En de andere helft aan chatgpt gevraagd.

Dat moet goedkomen!

[Brick]

@septentrio

Jullie mogen geloven wat jullie zelf willen hoor

Jij ook.

@septentrio

hoor het graag als straks iemand geselecteerd is met foutieve antwoorden.

Vandaar de open vragen. Ze kunnen altijd afwijken. Nobody knows and Nobody cares.

Als iemand fouten antwoorden heeft en je hebt een 1969 ‘gewonnen’ en die vertelt jou dat… wat dan?
Ga je dan een figuurlijk bommetje leggen bij Swatch.

In de regels staat ook dat zij bepalen en zij kunnen afwijken.

[UglyKing]

Misschien leuk om te checken: officiele antwoorden staan nu online op de swatch site
https://www.swatch.com/nl-NL/esta/answers

[Foentser]

Enige waaraan ik twijfel wat ik heb ingevuld is de beat time. Voor de rest heb ik alles juist.

[Foentser]

Dus Swatch zegt 886.7

886.7 * 86.4
= 76 610.88 seconden
= 21 * 3600 + 16 * 60 + 50.88

Zij zeggen dus om 21:16:50.88? Daar volg ik even niet hoor. LM-5 landde op 21:17:40 Biel Mean Time?

[trkk29]

@Foentser

volg ik even niet hoor. LM-5 landde op 21:17:40 Biel

ben benieuwd of ze het echt op decimalen nauwkeurig willen. ik heb het afgerond naar 887, misschien zullen ze dat ook zien als goed antwoord

[Brick]

In jouw geval zou ik nu al mail zenden aan Swatch en je positie claimen op basis van je informatie en kennis.

[lasteraar]

Geniet er nog maar van jongens. Dat mensen iets kunnen bepalen.

- YouTube